|
|||||||
|
Retirement Communities & Senior Housing |
Retirement Living News September 2008 HEADLINES (Click on headline to read story)
Archive
of Past Issues
New Retirement Communities New Tax
Foundation Report on State/Local Tax Burdens If all other things are equal, a state with a lower burden is a more attractive place to retire than a state with a higher one. To get a true sense of which state is less expensive, you need to look at state and local tax burdens. Only then do the low tax states stand out. It is estimated by the Washington, D.C.-based Tax Foundation that the nation as a whole will pay on average 9.7 percent of its income in state and local taxes in 2008, down from 9.9 percent in 2007 primarily because income grew faster than tax collections between 2007 and 2008. New Jersey residents paid 11.8 percent topping the charts. New Yorkers were close behind, paying 11.7 percent, and Connecticut was third at 11.1 percent. The top 10 were rounded out by Maryland (10.8 percent), Hawaii (10.6 percent), California (10.5 percent), Ohio (10.4 percent), Vermont (10.3 percent), Wisconsin (10.2 percent) and Rhode Island (10.2 percent). Alaskans pay the least, 6.4 percent in 2008, but Nevada is close at 6.6 percent. In four states the residents pay between 7 and 8 percent of their income in state and local taxes: Wyoming (7.0 percent), Florida (7.4 percent), New Hampshire (7.6 percent) and South Dakota (7.9 percent). Four other states round out the bottom 10: Tennessee (8.3 percent), Texas (8.4 percent), Louisiana (8.4 percent) and Arizona (8.5 percent). The rankings calculated by the Tax Foundation are sometimes confused with the rankings based on Census Bureau data that use state and local tax collections. The difference is out-of-state tax payments. When state and local governments collect large amounts from non-residents, whether as tourists, commuters, businesses or property owners, the Census Bureau counts them in their collections of the taxing state. The Tax Foundation study counts them in the residential state of the taxpayer. For more information about the report and the tax burden in each state, click here. Top AARP Forms Relationship with RetirementJobs.com to Offer Career Advice and Online Job Searching In response to the aging of America's workforce and the need or desire of many baby boomers to keep working due to the recent downturn in the economy, AARP is collaborating with www.retirementjobs.com/ to help mature workers search for full-time, part-time and flexible jobs offered by age-friendly employers. As part of the effort, both organizations will identify employers that maintain policies, practices and programs consistent with employment of people age 50 and older based solely on the proficiency, qualifications and contribution. The online collaboration comes on the heels of an AARP economic survey (May, 2008) that found that 81 percent of all Americans ages 45 and over say the economy is in fairly bad or very bad condition. The survey showed that more than one in four older workers (27 percent) say they postponed plans to retire because of the recent downturn. Additional AARP research found that nearly eight in 10 Boomers said that they planned to work into their retirement years. Recent AARP surveys have found that those planning to work into their retirement years primarily are doing so to earn needed additional income, maintain health benefits or, in some cases, to remain active and gain personal enrichment. AARP's new relationship with
RetirementJobs.com, part of the extensive expansion of its online
career services, also comes at a time when 50 plus workers are playing
an increasingly important role in the labor force. Fifty and over
workers already represent 28 percent of the workforce, and projections
show that by 2016 that figure will jump to 33.5 percent, more than one
in three in the labor force. To read the economic survey report -- The
Economic Slowdown's Impact on Middle-Aged and Older Americans --
go to http://assets.aarp.org/rgcenter/econ/economy_survey.pdf. New Housing
Bill Makes Substantial Changes to The $300 billion housing bill signed into law on July 30 by President Bush helps stretched homeowners renegotiate their mortgages and provides tax credits to first-time buyers. It also addresses three major criticisms of reverse mortgage loans, which are increasingly popular among homeowners 62 and older who use the money for living expenses, health care, prescription drugs or to pay off an existing mortgage. During the last federal fiscal year, ending September 30, 2007 more than 107,000 homeowners took out a reverse mortgage, compared to 76,351 the year prior and 7,781 in 2001. With a reverse mortgage, you can tap your home equity without having to make monthly payments. Instead the bank pays you. The loan comes due only when you die, sell or move away permanently. The amount you get depends on the home's value, location, interest rates and the age of the youngest borrower if there are co-owners. The new bill raises the amount you can get from the mortgage and lowers the cost of getting it. Most reverse mortgages today are Home Equity Conversion Mortgages (HECMs), which are backed by the Federal Housing Administration, so you'll still get your money even if the lender goes under. (The other two types are private loans and single-purpose reverse mortgages offered by some state and local government agencies and nonprofit organizations.) FHA limits the amount you can borrow with a HECM, which ranges from $200,160 to $362,790, depending on the county you live in. The new housing law, which will take approximately 60 to 90 days to implement, creates a single national loan limit of $417,000 that can increase to as much as $625,500 in high-cost areas. A second criticism has been that the transaction fees for reverse mortgages are too high. An AARP Public Policy Institute study in December 2007 found that high cost is the reason 63 percent of reverse-mortgage shoppers ultimately decided against applying for the loan. And 69 percent of actual borrowers agreed that costs were high. The origination fees lenders can charge are currently capped at 2 percent of your home's value or the county lending limit, whichever is lower. The housing bill recently reduced the maximum fee to 2 percent on the initial $200,000 of the home's value and 1 percent on the balance thereafter, with a cap of $6,000. But some lenders charge less, so it can pay to shop around and negotiate on the fees charged. Also, you should bargain on closing costs, service fees, mortgage insurance premiums, and interest rates. And finally, the new bill puts an end to one of the main problems related to reverse mortgages: lenders cross-selling other financial products. The new law forbids pushy marketing tactics requiring the purchase of an annuity, insurance product (such as long term care) or investment product as a condition of the loan. In order to qualify for a HECM, borrowers must discuss the loan with a loan counselor employed by a nonprofit or public agency approved by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. "You should take the counselor very seriously and be very forthcoming so that the counselor can help you do a thorough job of making sure that a reverse mortgage is really the answer for you," says Peter Bell, president of the National Reverse Mortgage Lenders Association, an organization that represents the reverse-mortgage industry. Barbara Stucki, director of home equity
initiatives for the National Council on Aging, recommends spending an
hour or longer discussing the loan. The counseling is free or has a
minimal cost. You can find a local housing counseling agency by
calling (800) 569-4287. The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority
recommends verifying the independence of counselors recommended by
your lender by asking whether they receive any funding from the lender
or the mortgage industry. Actuaries Urge Policy Makers to Increase Retirement Age The American Academy of Actuaries is urging policymakers to immediately address Social Security's long-term financial problems by raising the normal retirement age to reflect increased longevity. The Academy's position statement on the retirement age for Social Security was released during a news conference early last month. The position statement was developed by the Academy's Board of Directors and essentially makes future recipients wait longer for their first benefit check because they probably will live longer anyway. The next president and a new Congress will come under increasing pressure to fix the Social Security system. Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama rejects any increase in the retirement age while his GOP rival John McCain opposes tax increases as a possible fix. Current benefits are supplied by payroll taxes from today's workers, all of whom pay a 6.2 percent Social Security payroll tax on income up to $102,000. Their employers match it, for a total tax of 12.4 percent. The tax applies only to earned income, not to passive income such as dividends and interest. Benefits are projected to exceed the Social Security system's tax revenues in about nine years. The program's trustees have said the Social Security trust fund will be depleted by 2041 without changes. A major problem, the actuaries say, is that people are living longer thereby drawing more money from the program. For many years, 65 has been the retirement age to receive full benefits. But under changes in 1983, only people born before Jan. 2, 1938, can collect full benefits at 65. Those born after that date face a gradually rising retirement age for full benefits until they reach 67. Current estimates show that by 2040, 65-year-old men and women could live at least 18 more years after becoming eligible for full Social Security benefits. The Academy said that increasing the
retirement age may be only part of the solution. But by acting now,
policymakers would have a fuller range of policy options to choose
from and be able to apply those options to more of the population. Fifteen Community Colleges Receive Grants to Develop Innovative Programs for Students Over 50 As 78 million baby boomers approach retirement, their attention is turning to staying active and re-focusing their careers--and they're about to get some help from America's community colleges, thanks to a recently-launched "Plus 50 Initiative." Ten community colleges will launch new "demonstration" programs for students over the age of 50, with the help of seed grants from the American Association of Community Colleges (AACC) and The Atlantic Philanthropies. They'll be aided with mentoring support from five "mentor" colleges that already have established programs for baby boomers. Organizers say the project is designed to help with one of the largest generational shifts affecting our nation, as baby boomers approach retirement and consider how to keep their lives active, healthy and engaged in careers and projects that matter to them. "The baby boomer generation wants to stay active in retirement and holds a wealth of knowledge and experience that society cannot afford to see leave the talent pool," said George R. Boggs, AACC President and CEO. "By retooling educational programs and adjusting for the needs of plus 50 students, community colleges can empower baby boomers to continue to give back by leading the vibrant and fulfilling lives they desire." The three-year program is sponsored by the AACC and is funded by a $3.2 million dollar grant from The Atlantic Philanthropies. The 10 demonstration colleges receiving grants are:
Colleges receiving grants to serve as mentors for the program are:
For 88 years, the AACC has been the
leading advocate for the nation's community colleges, which currently
number more than 1,125 and serve more than 12 million students
annually. Its membership comprises 95 percent of all public two-year
colleges -- the largest, most accessible, most diverse sector of U.S.
higher education. As institutions committed to providing access,
community service and lifelong learning, community colleges have
long-focused on the needs of adults who are already in the workforce,
many of whom are seeking new skills and knowledge for changes in their
lives and careers. Brookings Predicts Five Intermountain West States Will Become the New American Heartland The southern Intermountain West region of the nation is experiencing rapid changes that many soon make it the "New American Heartland," according to an 80-page report published by the Brookings Metropolitan Policy Program. Five states - Arizona, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, and Utah - currently hold some of the fastest growing places anywhere in the country. It is now apparent that an extraordinary new settlement pattern has emerged to characterize growth in the nation's fastest growing regions. In the 1960s, Dallas and Fort Worth were clearly colliding, as were Washington and Baltimore in the 1980s. These mountain states have grown surprisingly urban, with more than 80 percent of their population, employment, and economic activity taking place in five emerging "megapolitan" areas: Arizona's Sun Corridor surrounding Phoenix and Tucson, Colorado's Front Range surrounding Denver, Utah's Wasatch Front taking in the areas surrounding Salt Lake City, the greater Las Vegas area extending from central Nevada into neighboring Arizona, and Northern New Mexico encompassing Santa Fe and Albuquerque. During the current decade these areas have captured 13 percent of the nation's growth. "We knew going in and the research confirms that this region is growing up, flexing its muscles, and distancing itself from California which historically has had an outsized impact on the West's development," said Bruce Katz, Vice President at the Brookings Institution and founding director of its Metropolitan Policy Program. "We believe that the economy of this region, its people, and its politics are becoming more central to the nation." Brookings projects that by 2040 these "Mountain Megas" may double in size. A number of trends are developing. The megapolitan areas need to harness their economic potential by developing policies that will lead to prosperity.
In a broad conclusion, the report says
the region should stop to revaluate its planning and development
practices or risk compounding past mistakes. There is a growing sense
that the legacy of a boomtown past may be finally catching up with the
West's big cities. To read the report, click
here. |
||||||
| [Communities]
[Great Places]
[Taxes]
[Retirement Living News]
[New Communities]
[Active Retirement Community Directory] [Jobs for Seniors] [Useful Resources] [Books] [Publications Online] [MarketPlace] [Special Products] [Aging Agencies] [Advertising] [About Us] [Contact] |
|||||||