|
|||||||
|
Retirement Communities & Senior Housing |
Retirement Living News December 2008 HEADLINES (Click on headline to read story)
Archive
of Past Issues
New Retirement Communities New Survey Reports One In Four Boomers Plan to Move One in four baby boomer generation households (26%) expects to move from their current home in the future, with the majority looking for a single-level home that is more comfortable or convenient. This is according to a telephone survey conducted by Opinion Research Corp. for AARP from August 29 to September 8, 2008. Echoing past surveys, most boomers (79%) say they would like to stay in their current home for as long as possible. Some (less than 10%) said they would like to stay in their current home but don't think they will be able to do so. Many of those who expect to move said they will be looking for a better house, a better climate or a home that is closer to family and friends. More than half of those boomers (age 45-64) planning to move expect to look for a home that's all on one level (59%). About half said they will look for a newer home (50%) or a smaller home (49%). Older boomers are significantly more likely than younger boomers to think that they will move into a single level home (68% vs. 54% of those planning to move), but age is not the only factor that affects expectations. Boomer men are more likely than women to believe they will move into a newer home (61% vs. 42%) or move into a home in a warmer or better climate (41% vs. 25%) Boomer women are more likely than men to think they will move into a smaller home (54% vs. 41%). "While boomers will reflect the
patterns of earlier generations and mostly age in place the sheer
number of boomers will increase demand for a whole variety of home and
community options," said Elinor Ginzler, Senior Vice President of
AARP. The number of persons age 65 and older is expected grow to 70
million by 2030. Advertisement Baby Boomers Retirement Some
55-Plus Communities May Abandon Age Restrictions in With the financial crisis deepening and the housing market stalled, a growing number of units in 55-plus communities are lying vacant. Across the country developers of active adult communities, along with homeowners' associations, are mulling over their options to attract more residents to their properties. Some are now considering what was once unthinkable - letting younger people in. They are debating whether to scrap the age restrictions that have helped define a way of life for retirees for almost five decades. Many housing units are sitting idle as potential buyers find themselves stuck in the housing crisis, unable to sell their homes and relocate. Existing residents whose investments have plunged in the past year are falling behind in their homeowners' dues. Clubhouse activities are also being scaled back. Changing the age of entry in a retirement community would alter the lifestyle of residents who say that is why they bought in the first place. An influx of younger residents could also affect relations with surrounding neighborhoods. Cities and towns have long favored the development of retirement communities because they provide tax revenue but do not require additional services like schools. Federal regulations require that 80% of residents in an active adult community must be at least 55 years old and that children under age 19 are excluded. Last year residents of Sun City Grand in Surprise, Ariz., voted to lower the age requirement to 45 from 55 though children are still excluded. For more information on this issue,
read the front page story that appeared in the December 1 issue of The
Wall Street Journal -- http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122809427244267951.html. Study Explores How Retirement Affects Married Relationships This study surveyed 1,064 adults ages 55-75 who were married or living as married, who are retired themselves and/or have a spouse who is retired. It found that most retirees do not re-enter the workforce after they retire. Those that do re-enter the workforce mostly do so because they are bored or they missed having something to do. Some say they return to work for monetary reasons. Approximately one-third of those who retired first also encouraged their spouse to retire. The survey was conducted a year ago for AARP The Magazine by Opinion Research Corp. but was just published in November 2008. Among the findings were the following:
To read the full 56-page report, go to:
http://assets.aarp.org/rgcenter/general/retired_spouses.pdf. Some Assisted Living Costs May Be Tax Deductible While assisted living costs continue to increase every year, some of the costs may be tax deductible, according to ElderLawAnswers. Medical expenses, including some long-term care expenses, are deductible if the expenses are more than 7.5 percent of the person's adjusted gross income. Generally, only the medical component of assisted living costs is deductible and ordinary living costs like room and board are not. In order for assisted living expenses to be tax deductible, the resident must be considered "chronically ill." This means a doctor or nurse has certified that the resident either:
In addition, to qualify for the deduction, personal care services must be provided according to a plan of care prescribed by a licensed health care provider. This means a doctor, nurse, or social worker must prepare a plan that outlines the specific daily services the resident will receive. Though not required by law, most assisted living facilities prepare care plans for their residents. If the resident is chronically ill and in the facility primarily for medical care, and the care is being performed according to a certified care plan, then the room and board may be considered part of the medical care and the cost may be deductible, just as it would be in a hospital. However, if the resident is in the assisted living facility for custodial and not medical care, the costs are deductible only to a limited extent. In any case, the expenses are not deductible if they are reimbursed by insurance or any other programs. ElderLawAnswers operates a Web site - www.ElderLawAnswers.com
-- that provides legal information, not legal advice. Its information
explains general legal concepts and principles which may or may not be
applicable to a particular person's situation. It is not a law firm,
does not give legal advice and no attorney-client relationship exists
between the site and any user. AARP Suspends Marketing of Fixed Benefit Indemnity Plans Following a Senate inquiry led by Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) AARP has suspended marketing and sales of several AARP-branded fixed benefit indemnity plans administered by UnitedHealth Group, one of the nation's largest insurers. Grassley, the senior Republican on the Senate Finance Committee, said the marketing of the products was often misleading because it suggested that they offered comprehensive coverage. The products carry names like AARP Medical Advantage, Essential Plus and Hospital Indemnity Plan. Grassley said that "there is no basic protection against high medical costs. The products may leave consumers seriously in debt if they need intensive medical care." William D. Novelli, the CEO of AARP, said he was eager to address Senator Grassley's concerns. He added that "ensuring the protection and keeping the trust of our members drives all that we do at AARP." Novelli said an investigation of the issues will be conducted by Elizabeth Rowe Costle who was the insurance commissioner of Vermont from 1992 to 2003. Grassley called AARP's action a
"step in the right direction." But he is still concerned
that people who bought the plans may not fully understand their
coverage.
|
||||||
| [Communities]
[Great Places]
[Taxes]
[Retirement Living News]
[New Communities]
[Active Retirement Community Directory] [Jobs for Seniors] [Useful Resources] [Books] [Publications Online] [MarketPlace] [Special Products] [Aging Agencies] [Advertising] [About Us] [Contact] |
|||||||